The Integration of Smartboard Media within the Direct Instruction Model to Enhance Students’ Learning Outcomes in Reaction Rate Topics

  • Feby Stefania Baan Tasik Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Army Auliah Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Sugiarti Sugiarti Universitas Negeri Makassar
Keywords: Smartboard, Direct instruction, Reaction rate, Learning outcomes, N-Gain

Abstract

The integration of technology in chemistry learning is increasingly essential to overcome the abstractness of chemical concepts. This study aims to examine the effect of smartboard media integration within the Direct Instruction model on students' learning outcomes in reaction rate material. A pre-experimental approach with a One Group Pretest-Posttest Design was used, involving 43 students of class X.E at SMK SMAK Makassar selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected through pretest and posttest instruments, then analyzed using the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test, N-Gain, and Cohen's d effect size. The results showed an increase in the average score from 49.30 in the pretest to 61.16 in the posttest. The Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test confirmed a significant difference (Asymp. Sig. = 0.000 < 0.05). Although the N-Gain value of 0.21 fell in the low category partly attributed to the ceiling effect for high-pretest students and the inherent conceptual complexity of reaction rate the Cohen's d value of 0.73 indicated a medium practical effect, comparable to other innovative chemistry teaching strategies. The synergy between smartboard's dynamic visualizations and the structured, step-by-step delivery of Direct Instruction effectively facilitated students' understanding of abstract submicroscopic concepts such as collision theory and activation energy. These findings suggest that smartboard-integrated Direct Instruction is a pedagogically promising approach for chemistry classrooms equipped with interactive technology, while differentiated feedback strategies are recommended to further optimize individual learning gains.

References

Ahmad, F., & Sari, N. I. (2025). Exploring the Wilcoxon Test in Science Education: A Literature Review of Empirical Research. Indonesian Journal of Educational Science, 7(2), 158–169. https://doi.org/10.31605/ijes.v7i2.4712

Aldalalah, O. M. A. (2020). The Effectiveness of Infographic via Interactive Smart Board on enhancing Creative Thinking: A Cognitive Load Perspective. International Journal of Instruction, 14(1), 345–364. https://doi.org/10.29333/IJI.2021.1412 0A

Azizatis Salma, & Syamsi Aini. (2023). Efektivitas Media Pembelajaran Power-Point Interaktif Berbasis Inkuiri Terbimbing pada Materi Larutan Peyangga terhadap Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 13(2), 514–519. https://doi.org/10.37630/jpm.v13i2.10 97

Babinčáková, M., Ganajová, M., & Bernard, P. (2023). Introduction of Formative Assessment Classroom Techniques (FACTs) to School Chemistry Teaching: Teachers’ Attitudes, Beliefs, and Experiences. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(9), 3276–3290. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c 00591

Clarisa, G., Prima, F., Hamidah, B. N., Sitanggang, T. P. M., A’isatul Hijriyah, S., Fitriatus Sa’diyah, T., & Hidayah, R. (2025). Proceeding of International Joint Conference on UNESA Proceeding of International Joint Conference on UNESA The Effectiveness of Using Animated Videos as A Learning Medium to Reduce Student Misconceptions About Reaction Rate Material. 3(1), 1–14. https://proceeding.unesa.ac.id/index.ph p/pijcu

da Silva, J. N., Teotônio, M. do S. C., Silveira Jucá, R. C., Castro, G. de L., & Melo Leite, A. J. (2025). 1925- 2024: One Century of Educational Games in Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 102(4), 1492– 1510. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c 01238

Davidovitch, N., & Yavich, R. (2017). The Effect of Smart Boards on the Cognition and Motivation of Students. Higher Education Studies, 7(1), 60–68. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v7n1p60

de Jong, T., Georgiou, M., Kapici, H. O., Schwichow, M., & Visser, T. C. (2025). Why not have the best of both worlds? How to use direct instruction principles in inquiry-based instructional design. In Learning and Individual Differences (Vol. 124, Number 2025, pp. 1–13). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2025.10 2785

Firmansyah, D., Pasim Sukabumi, S., & Al Fath Sukabumi, S. (2022). Teknik Pengambilan Sampel Umum dalam Metodologi Penelitian: Literature Review. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Holistik (JIPH), 1(2), 85–114. https://doi.org/10.55927

Gan, Z., An, Z., & Liu, F. (2021). Teacher Feedback Practices, Student Feedback Motivation, and Feedback Behavior: How Are They Associated With Learning Outcomes? Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 697045. 1. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.697 045

Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A sixthousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809

Jammeh, A. L. J., Karegeya, C., & Ladage, S. (2022). The Smartboard in Chemistry Classrooms: What is Its Effect on Chemistry Teaching and Learning in Selected Topics in Grade 11? International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(9), 217–231. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.9.12

Jammeh, A. L. J., Karegeya, C., & Ladage, S. (2023). The interactive classroom: Integration of SMART notebook software in chemistry education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(8), 1. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13458

Jammeh Abdou, L. J., Karegeya, C., & Ladage, S. (2022). Effectiveness of Smart Technologies In Chemistry Teaching and Learning of Grade Eleventh Students In The Gambia. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on The Future of Education, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.17501/26307413.202 2.5101

Lenaini, I. (2021). Teknik Pengambilan Sampel Purposive dan Snowball Sampling Info Artikel Abstrak. HISTORIS : Jurnal Kajian, Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Sejarah, 6(1), 33–39. https://doi.org/10.31764/historis.vXiY. 4075

Nissen, J. M., Talbot, R. M., Thompson, A. N., & Van Dusen, B. (2018). A comparison of Hake’s g and Cohen’s d for analyzing gains on concept inventories. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(010115), 1– 27. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysE ducRes.14.010115

Putri, D. P. E., & Muhtadi, A. (2018). Pengembangan multimedia pembelajaran interaktif kimia berbasis android menggunakan prinsip mayer pada materi laju reaksi. Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Pendidikan, 5(1), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.21831/jitp.v5i1.1375 2

Rahayu, I., . W., Widhiyanti, T., & Mulyani, S. (2024). Analysis of Misconceptions on the Factors that Affect the Reaction Rate. KnE Social Sciences, 2024, 140– 150. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i13.159 14

Shiddiqi, M. H. A., Arthamena, V. D., Ayyubi, M., Manarisip, A. J., & Aznam, N. (2024). Systematic Literature Review: Analysis of Misconception Problems and Diagnostic Instruments for Learning Chemistry. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(4), 168–179. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i4. 5189

Suryadi, A. (2022). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Langsung (Direct Instruction) untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Mata Pelajaran Kimia Materi Minyak Bumi di Kelas X MIA-3 Semester I SMAN 1 Sanggar Tahun Pelajaran 2021/2022. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Indonesia (JPPI), 2(1), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.53299/jppi.v2i1.168

Tsayang, G., Batane, T., & Majuta, A. (2020). The impact of interactive Smart boards on students’ learning in secondary schools in Botswana: A students’ perspective. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 16(2), 22-39.

Published
2026-06-30
How to Cite
Baan Tasik, F., Auliah, A., & Sugiarti, S. (2026). The Integration of Smartboard Media within the Direct Instruction Model to Enhance Students’ Learning Outcomes in Reaction Rate Topics. Entalpi Pendidikan Kimia, 7(2), 127-138. https://doi.org/10.24036/epk.v7i2.619
Section
Articles