Description of Learningg Outcomes, Misconceptions, and Inhibitory Materials, and Their Relationship With The Implementation of The Scientific Approach

  • Aslamiah Al Anshori Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Zonalia Fitriza
Keywords: Learning Outcomes, Misconceptions, Inhibitory Materials, Scientific Approach, Chemical Bonds

Abstract

The 2013 curriculum requires the application of scientific approach in learning. As many as 53.84% of the 13 chemistry teachers in West Sumatra experienced difficulties in implementing  scientific approach cause the limited time allocation and low student learning outcomes.This study aims to describe learning outcomes, misconceptions, and inhibitory materials and the relationship between the implementation of the scientific approach to the chemical bonding material. This descriptive research uses Mixed Method with Convergent mixed parallel design. The population is the students of X class SMA in Pasaman Regency with sample of class X MIPA. Data were collected using document analysis, observation methods, and tests. The data were analyzed using the Miles & Huberman analysis technique, normality test, and correlation test. The results of this study indicate that the scientific approach has not been implemented properly. Student learning outcomes <4% and as many as 61 types of misconceptions were identified cause the presence of inhibitory materials such as atomic stability for chemical bonds, PEI and PEB for molecular geometry, and Lewis structures for intermolecular interactions. The results of the analysis concluded that there was a correlation between the implementation of the scientific approach and learning outcomes with a significance of 0.00 and a correlation coefficient of 0.617. So, the implementation of the scientific approach affects student learning outcomes.  

References

Aryungga, S. D. E. & Effendy, S. (2017). Study of Chemical Bonding Misconception on Senior High School Students caused by Learning Strategy and Content in Textbook. Chemistryeducation.Uii.Ac.Id, (2010): 12–13. Tersedia di https://chemistryeducation.uii.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Septyadi-David-Eka-Aryungga-Effendy-Suharti.pdf.

Azura, S. & Copriady, J. (2017). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Materi Ikatan Kimia Menggunakan Tes Diagnostik Pilihan Ganda Tiga Tingkat (Three Tier) pada Peserta Didik Kelas X MIA SMA Negeri 8 Pekanbaru. Jurnal Online Mahasiswa, 4(3): 1–13.

Copriady, J. (2015). Strategi dan Langkah-Langkah Menciptakan Guru Kimia Unggul. Pekanbaru: Kementerian Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi Universitas Riau.

Fitriza, Z., Aini, F.Q., Handayani, P. & Munira, I. (2020). Development of structured essay diagnostic test of chemistry (SEDToC) to investigate senior high school student’s conception of buffer solution. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2229.

Katimo, Suparmi & Sukarmin. (2016). Pengaruh Pembelajaran dengan Pendekatan Saintifik Menggunakan Metode Eksperimen dan Demonstrasi terhadap Prestasi Belajar dan Kreativitas ditinjau dari Sikap Ilmiah. Inkuiri, 5(2): 87–93.

Kemendikbud. (2014). Konsep dan Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Kumpha, P., Suwannoi, P. & Treagust, D.F. (2014). Thai Grade 10 Students Conceptual Understanding of Chemical Bonding. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 143: 657–662. Tersedia di http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.458.

Lisa, I., Irianti, M., Rahmad, M., Education, P. & Program, S. (2013). Analysis Implementation of Scientific Approach Based Curriculum 2013 in Physics Subject To the Student Preception Sma State Pekanbaru Analisis Keterlaksanaan Pendekatan Saintifik Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013 Pada Mata Pelajaran. 1–12.

Musfiqon, H., & Nurdyansyah, D. (2015). Pendekatan Pembelajaran Saintifik. Sidoarjo: Nizamia Learning Center.

Nahum, T. L., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Hofstein, A. & Taber, K. S. (2010). Teaching and learning the concept of chemical bonding. Studies in Science Education, 46(2): 179–207.

Permendikbud. (2013). Jurnal Lampiran Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 65 Tahun 2013Tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.

Qomariyah. (2014). Kesiapan Guru dalam Menghadapi Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi IKIP Veteran Semarang, 2(1): 21–35. Tersedia di https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/37076-ID-kesiapan-guru-dalam-menghadapi-implementasi-kurikulum-2013.pdf.

Reksoatmodjo. (2010). Pengembangan kurikulum pendidikan teknologi dan kejuruan. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Ridwan, A. (2014). Pembelajaran Saintifik untuk Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Saputri, A. C. & Ridlo, S. (2016). Hubungan Antara Interaksi Interpersonal Guru IPA dan Pendekatan Saintifik dengan Hasil Belajar Siswa SMP. Peningkatan Kualitas Pembelajaran Sains dan Kompetensi Guru melalui Penelitian & Pengembangan dalam Menghadapi Tantangan Abad-21, (2012): 55–62.

Suryabrata, S. (1998). Metodologi Penelitian. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Syukri, S. (1999). Kimia Dasar 2. Bandung: ITB.

Yoki, A. (2018). Buku Pegangan Pembelajaran Berorientasi Pada Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi. Direktorat Jenderal Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Published
2022-06-01
How to Cite
Al Anshori, A., & Fitriza, Z. (2022). Description of Learningg Outcomes, Misconceptions, and Inhibitory Materials, and Their Relationship With The Implementation of The Scientific Approach. Entalpi Pendidikan Kimia, 3(2), 40-49. https://doi.org/10.24036/epk.v3i2.266
Section
Articles